Systemax has decided to seize further enhancement update on SAI and shift towards SAI2 development.
Because SAI would abandon some of the planned features, SAI2 will be offered free for previous license owner. However SAI will still be updated/supported for bugs and issues.
Yont dont even understand how was I looking forward Sai’s next updates.
Oh wow! Can’t wait!
Text tool and higher layer limit!!!
I would pay for it all over again if I had to. It’s that good.
cedpipe said:the image link is broken too, how fitting
Man, it’s gonna be a swell week, I can tell.
My Netgear Gigabit router died today, presumably because of a power surge followed by a three hour power outage.
I bought that router on December 9th, 2012.
Moondancer, wasn’t able to finish this before the 30 minute challenge ended.
I like this for several reasons.
Little too aggressive with some of the darker lines, but I think this will do.
Onward to colors.
Todays episode bought to you
by lesbianism and bondage.
The Opera Browser
…has taken a gigantic leap backwards. Maybe that’s a good thing in the long run, but in the short run, the latest iteration of Opera is a huge disappointment.
Just some experimenting around. I think the darks need more contrast next time though.
Actually, the whole thing probably needs more contrast.
Also the purple of her mane is different on every display I see it on… omfg.
I love the way you’ve done her ear.
I’m probably going to steal that. More contrast would be good, but be careful not to use too much black when you add contrast. I try to use a slightly darker shade of the same color, then shift the hue one way or the other to get depth without muddying it up.
Her mane color doesn’t look “show accurate”, but it looks purple to me on both my monitors. Most people don’t know how to (or don’t know that they should) calibrate their monitors, so there’s going to be appearance variances from screen to screen. Just keep your monitor tweaked in as best you can and that’s all you can really do.
asksolarflair said::3 looking good. The eyes come through better here than on the other version for sure as well as general detail I think. Must be the lead like you said.
If you look at them side by side (the actual paper drawings, not the scans), the lines seem to be about the same quality to me, to be honest. I’m kinda hoping when I do a rescan that it’ll just fix itself, and the initial scan was just a fluke or I screwed something up. Or maybe I just need a better scanner. >.>
Also keep in mind that for these, the eyes are done all digitally. That’s why they have the zombie-pony look to them. That one line I’ve got in there is mostly just a guideline for when I do the eyes in the color version. :)
I’m really not sure what the difference is, but this RD&SC scan came out much better than the AJ&AB scan. It’s possible that my choice of leads maybe made a difference. I used a combination of 4H, 2H, HB and 2B on AJ&AB from a couple different manufacturers, whereas RD&SC was done with 2H, using HB to make darker/thicker lines. It could also be my scanner or the software running it is doing something automagically that I’d prefer it didn’t do and I’m just not aware of it. I dunno. I think I’m gonna stick to just the two types of lead to do Rarity and Sweetie Belle though. Much faster and simpler, and the results are about the same.